| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
Zending 3 thumbs up


Joined: 23 Apr 2007 Posts: 850 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
#21 |
You know, to be honest, if you laid into any practitioner of a martial art and destroyed him with BJJ, he would be more heartbroken and angry rather than interested in learning BJJ.
We put our heart and souls into BJJ, and they do the same for their martial art. Most of them are just too prideful to admit when their martial art is inneffective. It's a sad truth. I don't bother trying to argue with people or prove anyone wrong about their practice. I just do my thing, and if the time ever comes where I have the chance to prove it in a peaceful way, I will. _________________ "Only a warrior chooses pacifism; others are condemned to it."
-Unknown
AOL Instant Messenger: MACH2000
IM me sometime, I'd love to talk! |
|
|
|
|
bma_mat 3 thumbs up


Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 10692 Location: Somewhere
|
Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:25 pm Post subject: |
#22 |
I have gotten friends who swore in punching to practice BJJ with me.
I just tell them to go all out on me with gloves on, and take them apart. Works every time. |
|
|
|
|
Locke07 3 thumbs up

Joined: 04 Mar 2007 Posts: 2693 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:07 am Post subject: |
#23 |
Honestly I agree BJJ is a great martial art. It's effective, but so is boxing? Many a time have we seen strikers laying out bjj guys. I don't know why people on this forum seem so hellbent on how much better BJJ is than any other martial art. Yes it works, but at the sime time there are people who practice martial arts for other reasons than beating each other up. Many of those katas you put on videos and laugh at are instructional expos, which I have seen many BJJ expos that look just as coreographed as those. I believe there was even one of the gracies.
Realize that everyone puts effort into their martial art. I do agree there are scams and con artists, but have decency for many other martial artist. You cannot actually attack it until you have tried it yourself. |
|
|
|
|
jiujitsunoob 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 2991 Location: South East USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:21 am Post subject: |
#24 |
| rhythmythyc wrote: |
| jiujitsunoob wrote: |
Kinda like all the Akido demonstrations I'v seen.
I'v yet to see a real Akido person fight in a street fight or mma type fight and win. |
Woa, attacking ninjitsu is one thing, but Aikido?
Aikido is partly based on Jujutsu, just as BJJ - only it focuses on standup (think of it as a cross between Judo and BJJ). A lot of the ideas are the same - centralization, not fighting strength with strength. The arm locks are very similar to BJJ. Obviously, no one martial art will make you a complete fighter - aikido and BJJ would actually make for a great combination. |
Like I was saying I have yet to see a "real" fight with Akido where the Akido guy wins. I could just be under educated but as jack was saying I wouldn't be sticking my arms out rushing anyone with such bad posture I would close like I do in my Muay Thai classes which is not sticking my arms straight out with my weight forward just screaming grab my arm and throw me to the ground.
All the demonstrations I've seen are highly choreographed - looks good but how practical in a real fight? |
|
|
|
|
jiujitsunoob 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Jul 2007 Posts: 2991 Location: South East USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 5:40 am Post subject: |
#25 |
| Locke07 wrote: |
| Honestly I agree BJJ is a great martial art. It's effective, but so is boxing? Many a time have we seen strikers laying out bjj guys. I don't know why people on this forum seem so hellbent on how much better BJJ is than any other martial art. |
Because boxing alone is not enough to stop a BJJ guy as was demonstrated in the first 4 UFC's. A Pure fighter from most (was about to say any but Judo that would be too inclusive) martial arts would be unable to stop the fight from going to the ground and once it does the BJJ guy is going to win the vast majority of the time.
| Locke07 wrote: |
| Yes it works, but at the sime time there are people who practice martial arts for other reasons than beating each other up. |
Because it's a Martial as in a combative Art - if the combat part of your art is crap in a real situation then call what you do something other than a Martial Art. Yoga comes to mind My Muay Thai instructor swears by Yoga for the betterment of your mind and body.
| Locke07 wrote: |
| Many of those katas you put on videos and laugh at are instructional expos, which I have seen many BJJ expos that look just as coreographed as those. I believe there was even one of the gracies. |
Perhaps - I've seen instructional videos on YouTube but I also see lots and lots and lots of grappling tournaments. The Akido demos are chorigraphed and the TDK demo I went to at the local school about 18 months ago was totally non-combat.
Just my observations. |
|
|
|
|
jackjitsu 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 16217 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:33 am Post subject: |
#26 |
But no one is bashing boxing, because it works! Sure, a boxer would have a huge problem against a grappler, as proven many times, but no one puts boxing in the same league as Aikido. Boxing actually works. Boxing is practiced at full contact with resisting opponents. A Boxer will KTFO an average joe on the street wih ease. We all know this. Boxing gets props from me because ive seen it work, its proven.
But Aikido? Man, ive goofed around with Aikdo guys before, and to me, it clearly falls into the McDojo league. You gotta admit, some so called "martial arts", emphasis on MARTIAL, are really not martial at all and a good debunking/bashing is well deserved in my opinion.
It pisses me off that so many people are still being fooled today into paying money each month to learn a supposed "martial art" for self defense that will do nothing but make them over confident and get their ass kicked in a real fight.
| Locke07 wrote: |
Honestly I agree BJJ is a great martial art. It's effective, but so is boxing? Many a time have we seen strikers laying out bjj guys. I don't know why people on this forum seem so hellbent on how much better BJJ is than any other martial art. Yes it works, but at the sime time there are people who practice martial arts for other reasons than beating each other up. Many of those katas you put on videos and laugh at are instructional expos, which I have seen many BJJ expos that look just as coreographed as those. I believe there was even one of the gracies.
Realize that everyone puts effort into their martial art. I do agree there are scams and con artists, but have decency for many other martial artist. You cannot actually attack it until you have tried it yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
rowandraper 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 614 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: |
#27 |
If I was that Aikido guy/girl with the long hair and some Karate guy did that to me .... (on the receiving end rather than studying their ineffective art) I'd take him down and mount him and see how he likes my friends GnP.
The force he used was way too excessive for a demonstration. He could quite easily show why Aikido doesn't work. Chump.
Also - my sister does Aikido (or used to) I'm going to drive her into submission to attending the RGA down in London. Hopefully she'll get something that works there. |
|
|
|
|
jackjitsu 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 16217 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: |
#28 |
I actually thought the force of the kick was ok.
He used a thrust kick meant to push someone back instead of really snapping it for damage. The reason the guy went flying back sooooo much was because his base was so terrible, and didnt react to the kick at all by jumping back a little and moving his base to avoid the energy.
He's lucky he didnt use a kick with intent to damage like a muay thai body would have because he obviously had no idea what to do against a kick except absorb the full force  |
|
|
|
|
rhythmythyc 3 thumbs up

Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 84 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: |
#29 |
Guys, you really have to know what you're talking about.
It is true that not all martial arts were created equal. Neither were men - but just because your brother weighs 50 pounds less than you doesn't mean he's not a man!
Aikido is best against grabs and other control situations (standing) - such as those moves a bouncer would do on you. Against hand and arm strikes it has some effectiveness (you have to have really good speed to pull some of the aikido moves), and none against kicks. Yes, you heard it right - aikido has no defense against kicks as far as I'm aware. But anybody with any intelligence would just stay out of range of the kicks or dodge/block them ;p
I see it as a good supplement to other martial arts, such as BJJ and TKD. However, alone it's purely a defense martial art, and not a combat sport. |
|
|
|
|
jackjitsu 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 16217 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 11:18 pm Post subject: |
#30 |
Im sure you can pull something effective from every martial art, but that doesnt mean you should waste your time on it. Ever hear of opportunity cost?
For every hour you spend wasting on aikido, you could have been doing an hour of muay thai, or boxing, or BJJ, or Judo, or wrestling.... you know, stuff that works. These are arts where the vast majority of the moves work, instead of an extreme minority.
Ive seen so many choreographed aikido demonstrations. Its seems like its the only thing they can do. Have you ever seen a video of aikdo practiced against a real opponent that looked anything like aikido???
Its like that video of those two high level kung fu masters that got into a fight. Once the fight gets real, all their extravagent kung fu moves go out the window and they looked like two untrained kids wrestling on the playground, proving what a waste of time kung fu is.
Life is too short to waste your time on stuff that is 95% BS. |
|
|
|
|
rediska 3 thumbs up

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1060
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:45 am Post subject: |
#31 |
Jack, aikido demonstrations are not choreographed. When you see someone thrown with an aikido technique and the audience applauds, the applause is for both the uke and the nage for performing their parts of the technique well. The word "choreographed" implies deception, while there isn't any present.
You are not supposed to use aikido in a fight (except for the most intense, hard-core varitey), and the aikido practitioners know this. However...
Even several months after I quit aikido, my feet were still so light, I was almost dancing as I walked. Hm, I wonder if that would come handy in a fight? Think boxing, avoiding your opponent's punches by constantly stepping out of his range. Then there are all the Ikkyo arm movements, due to which my shoulders are *still* pretty well developed and strong. And after you do a couple hundred Ikkyos, your elbows are going to become way more dangerous than the elbows of an average person, because it's just like doing an Ikkyo technique, you don't even have to think - bam! bam! BAM!
That's just two examples and there are a lot more of similar indirect benefits, but the point is that you should stop bashing Aikido. True, it's not the martial art for someone who is serious about realistic fighting, because of its none-violent philosophy, among other things, but it does have some self-defense value and it's not worthless. |
|
|
|
|
jackjitsu 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 16217 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:46 am Post subject: |
#32 |
| rediska wrote: |
You are not supposed to use aikido in a fight (except for the most intense, hard-core varitey), and the aikido practitioners know this.....
True, it's not the martial art for someone who is serious about realistic fighting.... |
See, this is what im talking about. The above statements and "Martial Art", do not gel. It fails the "martial" test. We should therefore call aikido "Dance Art" or something.
| Quote: |
| but it does have some self-defense value and it's not worthless. |
Like I said before, the opportunity cost is too high to take a so called martial art where only a minority of techniques have an usefulness. If its not MOSTLY useful, then I think it needs to be called out. I too have wasted many years on uneffective martial arts, and I know it can be hard to let go, but id rather deal with reality. Id gladly trade in my decade of training in stuff like kung fu, karate and TKD for 2 years of muay thai!
We could say Aikido is good for exercise, or its fun, but would I ever send someone to AIkido class to learn to defend themselves?!??! Hell no, complete waste of time, and even counter productive, giving the student a FALSE sense of security and over confidence which could get them into trouble.
And I disagree, about the choreographed. Maybe choreographed is not exactly the right word. How about staged? Or using a "cooperative opponent"? In any case, take any of those Aikdo demo's and replace his opponent who slowly charges him with an arm outreached, with a 6 month BJJ white belt and what would happen?
You would end up with an Aikdo guy on his back fully mounted wondering why his fancing little foot work failed to work.
THATS the big problem I have with these Aikido "demo's". They show unrealistic techniques that ONLY WORK IN DEMO's
Compare this to Rickson Gracie and Royler Gracie giving a demo at Pride. Obviously choreographed, but the big difference is, you see them using the exact same moves against live resisting opponents. They could nail you with all those moves day in and day out and in fact do this at their schools every day against resisting opponents.
I dont think ive seen a single aikido practitioner pull off multiple aikido moves like you see in their choreographed demo's against an unwanting, resisting opoonent. Not once. That just stinks of pure MA mythology to me. The Aikido guys I sparred with surely couldnt do it. |
|
|
|
|
GreatBlueBelt 3 thumbs up


Joined: 22 Oct 2006 Posts: 204
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:17 am Post subject: |
#33 |
| Gotta agree with JJ, Aikido is one of the most unrealistic martial arts ive seen. I think your typical highscool scrapper would kill you if thats all you knew. A wrestler for sure. Im gonna do a poll |
|
|
|
|
rediska 3 thumbs up

Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 1060
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:22 am Post subject: |
#34 |
Lol, Jack, I'm not an Aikido BB, unfortunately, so I can't tell exactly how much a master of Aikido can do. However...
| Quote: |
| Or using a "cooperative opponent"? |
Yeah, Aikido does require a compliant uke. But there is a reason you shouldn't try to resist some of the techniques. You wouldn't try to resist an armbar, if your opponent has got you tight and already started cranking, right? You tap, to avoid having your arm broken. Well, human wrists are pretty fragile, and unless you go along with some of the techniques you will have yours broken sooner or later.
| Quote: |
| "In any case, take any of those Aikdo demo's and replace his opponent who slowly charges him with an arm outreached, with a 6 month BJJ white belt and what would happen?" |
Well, we already had a 6 month BJJ white belt tell us he beat Aikido 5-dans, so your question had been answered. Then again, that white belt already knew a ton of Aikido, so he probably didn't make any stupid mistakes. Jack, if you were to, say, try to unbalance the standing Aikido BB by grabbing at his kimono, you would basically be giving him your arm and the value of learning Aikido would immediatly dawn upon you. Nykios are some of the most effective techniques Aikido has, and they can really hurt. If applied at full force and with speed, I'm sure they can break a wrist quickly and without much effort. |
|
|
|
|
nokneebarsonmeplease 3 thumbs up


Joined: 08 Feb 2007 Posts: 70 Location: San Angelo, tx
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: |
#35 |
my ju jitsu instructor is also an akido instructor. on day when i came by to pay my bill he was in the middle of an akido class. i waited untill he was done. once finished i ask him about this akido and its practical application.
he stated " akido is an art, unless you dedicate almost a decade to it,their isno way it will ever be practical self defense. he said for self defense im in the right class. then i asked him what if i dedicated 10yrs to akido could i take a black belt in ju jitsu, he laughed and said" most likly no".he said a purple in ju jitsu could easily take an practicioner of akido with ten yrs experiance. |
|
|
|
|
Atomicfrog 3 thumbs up


Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 88 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 11:54 am Post subject: |
#36 |
I love Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. I think it's the greatest MA out there and pound for pound, it's one of the most effective. Having said that though, there seems to be an arrogance in the community that other martial arts are not worthy of respect. I don't mean this as a blanket statement, not everyone behaves this way, but I see a lot of BJJ practitioners casting judgment on other arts. If someone challenges the effectiveness of BJJ then by all means, put them in their place, but a true professional doesn't need to go around thumping their chest to prove how superior they are. Actions speak volumes more than words.
I disagree that a Martial Art is worthless if you can't kick beat someone up with it. People practice different styles for many more reasons than self defense. Discipline, fitness, self cultivation, character development, and self confidence are all valid reasons for practicing a martial art and I don't think it is our place to stand back and stare down our noses at others because they do not share our passion. _________________ Precious Father, why have you given me this desire to wrestle and then made me such a stinky warrior?
Atomicfrog-space |
|
|
|
|
vanguard 3 thumbs up


Joined: 18 Oct 2006 Posts: 690 Location: Apex, NC
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:09 pm Post subject: |
#37 |
Oddly, I've always had a higher sense of value around Aikido than most of the other martial arts. I kind of put it near judo. We had a couple of Aikido guys in my school and they always have wrist cranks to add to moves that actually make them harder to deal with. _________________ I can kick BJ Penn's ass in ping pong |
|
|
|
|
Tallmark

Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 145 Location: Orlando, FL USA
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 12:57 pm Post subject: |
#38 |
You might want to check out "Beverly Hills Ninja" with the late Chris Farley. This will give you some insider info on this deadly cult that continues to exist.  |
|
|
|
|
jackjitsu 3 thumbs up


Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 16217 Location: Raleigh, NC
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: |
#39 |
| Atomicfrog wrote: |
I disagree that a Martial Art is worthless if you can't kick beat someone up with it. People practice different styles for many more reasons than self defense. Discipline, fitness, self cultivation, character development, and self confidence are all valid reasons for practicing a martial art and I don't think it is our place to stand back and stare down our noses at others because they do not share our passion. |
Thats fine, but it doesnt qualify as "martial" then. Seems like a form of false advertising to me. It's also irrelevant to me if they share my passion or not. This is not a "bjj is great, everything else sucks" attitude. This is simply a, im tired of unproven stuff being sold as *martial* arts. Like I said before, you wont catch me bashing judo, boxing, wrestling, sambo, muay thai, etc. Its not a BJJ attitude, its a show me the beef attitude. I have yet to see the beef with Aikido, it doesnt seem to deliver what it promises. |
|
|
|
|
Atomicfrog 3 thumbs up


Joined: 22 Jun 2007 Posts: 88 Location: South Carolina
|
Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: |
#40 |
| jackjitsu wrote: |
Thats fine, but it doesnt qualify as "martial" then. Seems like a form of false advertising to me. It's also irrelevant to me if they share my passion or not. This is not a "bjj is great, everything else sucks" attitude. This is simply a, im tired of unproven stuff being sold as *martial* arts. Like I said before, you wont catch me bashing judo, boxing, wrestling, sambo, muay thai, etc. Its not a BJJ attitude, its a show me the beef attitude. I have yet to see the beef with Aikido, it doesnt seem to deliver what it promises. |
What exactly does Akido promse then? According to Wikipedia, Aikido is described as follows.
| Quote: |
Aikido (合気道, aikidō?), translated as "the way of harmonious spirit", is a Japanese martial art developed by Morihei Ueshiba as a synthesis of his martial studies, philosophy, and religious beliefs. Ueshiba's goal was to create an art practitioners could use to defend themselves without injuring their attacker.
Aikido emphasizes joining with an attack and redirecting the attacker's energy, as opposed to meeting force with force, and consists primarily of body throws and joint-locking techniques. In addition to physical fitness and technique, mental training, controlled relaxation, and development of "spirit" (ki) are emphasized in aikido training. |
I certainly don't know enough about Aikido or care enough about it to get into a lengthy defense. My point was more towards the general arrogance that some BJJ practitioners seem to have towards other martial arts. And if I were to judge BJJ only on combat effectiveness, I would say it is one of the most effective. However, I still feel strongly that the Martial Arts are not just for self defense. In the case of Aikido, it probably doesn't deliver if you only expect to be able to throw armies of attackers to the mat. But many other benefits can be achieved just the same.
To be fair, after watching some of the Gracie videos showing them trouncing other martial artists, one might be led to believe that they could do the same and overlook the fact that the guys in the video are the elite top of the food chain in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. _________________ Precious Father, why have you given me this desire to wrestle and then made me such a stinky warrior?
Atomicfrog-space |
|
|
|
|
|